You should consider the following points in preparing your critique:
- What is the main contribution of the paper?
- Is the abstract appropriate and adequate digest of the paper?
- Does the introduction clearly state the background?
- Is the paper's coverage of the chosen topic comprehensive?
- Is the performance of the proposed system/algorithm rigorously characterized?
- Does the paper provide enough information to replicate their experiments?
- Is software made available to the community?
- Is the list of references adequate?
- Are the relative lengths of sections appropriate for the material covered in each section?
- Are there too-many/too-few figures? Are all figures appropriately captioned?
- How readable is the paper (regardless of technical content)?
1 comment:
those are some valuable points to keep in mind while reviewing research papers. thanks.
Post a Comment